In Colin Kaepernick’s press conference, he talks about why he will not stand during the national anthem. Kaepernick says he will not stand for the national anthem because America is not giving all of its citizens freedom, justice, and equal opportunity. Kaepernick believes that he should not stand up for a flag that represents an unjust nation. He says that he will stand up once he believe the nation is just for all people. Kaepernick did not give a specific thing that he wants to see change that will cause him to stand. Kaepernick is primarily doing this in order to bring awareness to the people who are being suppressed. He specifically mentions his distaste for the the police force. He believes the police force does not get enough training and that they are one of the biggest culprits of suppression, and this can be seen most blatantly in police brutality against African Americans. Kaepernick did not use any statistics, but he used common knowledge that African Americans experience police brutality at a higher rate than any other race and that it does not take much training in order to become a police officer. This combination is effectively used to show that change is needed.
By Justin De Burgo
This post has massive formatting issues. First, the title should be in the Orange box at top instead of centered very oddly in your text. That's only a minor issue, but then a major flaw is that you have black font on a dark grey background, and it is very hard to read. Also, you don't have any links to support your claims, which is especially needed on your statistical claim regarding police brutality rates, but is supported by no evidence, instead being dismissed as "common knowledge". Dakota
ReplyDeleteI liked reading your post. I agree that police brutality against black Americans has become common knowledge thanks to the media and the outspokenness of racial justice groups, such as Black Lives Matter, but I feel evidence or examples, such as the wrongful death of Sandra Bland or Philando Castille can aid in emphasizing your point about Kaepernick's logos. I personally believe that Kaepernick's arguments makes a strong appeal to not only logos, but pathos and ethos as well. I think you did a good job on this analysis, my only critique would be is to add evidence and examples.
ReplyDelete